CO129-178 - Governor Hennessy - 1877 [6-8] — Page 108

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

103

Muder Section XIX of Ordinance

that it is

Not of 1816 it would sum not necessary for the Magistrates to declare the junk & cargo forfeited to the Crown but that the effect of Section XIX taken together with Section that upon conviction

XXIII is

arises

of the Master the junk cargo because ipso facto forfeited to the Crown If this be so the question whether the Government ought to enforce the forfeiture. It seems clear that in the opinion of the Magistrate who tried the

case so

case it was

not a

far as the breach of the

Edit History

2026-05-21 16:56:34 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct

Live

View comparison

AI Proofread

103 Muder Section XIX of Ordinance that it is Not of 1816 it would sum not necessary for the Magistrates to declare the junk & cargo forfeited to the Crown but that the effect of Section XIX taken together with Section that upon conviction XXIII is arises of the Master the junk cargo because ipso facto forfeited to the Crown If this be so the question whether the Government ought to enforce the forfeiture. It seems clear that in the opinion of the Magistrate who tried the case so case it was not a far as the breach of the

Baseline (Original)

103 Muder Section XIX of Ordinance that it is Not of 1816 it would sum not necessary for the Magistrates to declare the junk & cargo forfeited to the brown but that the effect of Section XIX taken together with Section that upon conviction XXIII is arives of the Master the junk roago because iper facto forfeited to the browns If this be so the question whether the Government ought to enforce the forfeiture. It seems clear that in the opinion of the Magistratur who tried the case so case it was not a far as the breach of the

2026-05-21 16:56:34 · Baseline

View content

103

Muder Section XIX of Ordinance

that it is

Not of 1816 it would sum not necessary for the Magistrates to declare the junk & cargo forfeited to the brown but that the effect of Section XIX taken together with Section that upon conviction

XXIII is

arives

of the Master the junk roago because iper facto forfeited to the browns If this be so the question whether the Government ought to enforce the forfeiture. It seems clear that in the opinion of the Magistratur who tried the

case so

case it was

not a

far as the breach of the

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.